IMAGING MODALITIES FOR THE EVALUATION OF MAXILLOFACIAL METASTATIC BONE LESIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND AN EVIDENCE MAP

Luciana Moraes HORNOS, Gabriela Franco da Rosa CAETANO, Thaís GIMENEZ, Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso CAVALCANTI

Resumo


Objectives: To conduct a systematic review and develop an evidence map of the main radiographic features and the usefulness of imaging modalities for the evaluation of maxillofacial metastatic bone lesions. Methods: The PECO strategy was used to define eligibility and to answer the question: Do cancer patients (P) undergoing imaging exams (E) present radiographic/imaging signs of metastases in the head region (O)? Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Only case reports/case series with histopathological confirmation were included. Risk of bias was assessed with Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Results: From 8,475 initial records and 20 manually retrieved studies, 29 articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies included 63 patients with metastases in maxilla (4.8%) or mandible (95.3%). Panoramic radiography is the primary imaging modality for the evaluation of metastatic lesions of the jaws (64.8%), followed by scintigraphy (25.39%), HCT (20.6%), lateral oblique radiograph (18.3%), periapical radiograph (14.1%), MRI (6.9%), SPECT (6.3%), PET/CT (3.17%), occlusal radiograph (2.8%), posteroanterior mandibular radiograph (2.8%), ultrasonography (1.58%), and mentonasal radiograph (1.4%). The predominant radiographic appearance of panoramic radiograph was an ill-defined osteolytic lesion (76.2%), although mixed or sclerotic patterns were noted in cases of breast and prostate cancer. Conclusions: Panoramic radiography supported initial screening. HCT and MRI defined lesion extent and soft tissue involvement. Scintigraphy showed increased tracer uptake near the affected jaw, while PET/CT demonstrated homogeneous uptake. Dental surgeons should remain vigilant during clinical and imaging evaluations, particularly in patients with a history of cancer.

Keywords: Jaw Neoplasms. Metastasis. Panoramic Radiograph. Computed Tomography. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Dentistry.


Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


ALBERS, D. D. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, metastatic to the mandible: report of case. Journal of the American Dental Association, Chicago, v. 81, n. 4, p. 883-886, 1970. Disponível em: https:// doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1970.0326. Acesso em: 14 maio. 2025.

ATARBASHI-MOGHADAM, S.; ATARABASHI-MOGHADAM, F.; NIAZMAND, M.; SHAHRABI-FARAHANI, S. Metastatic sarcomas of the oral cavity: a systematic review. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Paris, v. 125, n. 2, p. 101656, 2024. Disponível em: https:// doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101656. Acesso em: 16 maio. 2025.

BOMBECCARI, G. P. et al. Accuracy of the cone beam computed tomography in the detection of bone invasion in patients with oral cancer: a systematic review. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Erzurum, v. 51, n. 3, p. 298-306, 2019. Disponível em: https:// doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2019.18101. Acesso em: 14 maio. 2025.

BUCIN, E.; ANDRÉASSON, L.; BJORLIN, G. Metastases in the oral cavity: case reports. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Copenhagen, v. 11, n. 5, p. 321-325, 1982. Disponível em: https:// doi: 10.1016/S0300-9785(82)80033-1. Acesso em: 20 maio. 2025.

CARMICHAEL, F. A.; MITCHELL, D. A.; DYSON, D. P. Two contrasting radiological presentations of prostatic adenocarcinoma in the jaws. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, London, v. 25, n. 5, p. 283-286, 1996. Disponível em: https:// doi: 10.1259/dmfr.25.5.9161183. Acesso em: 20 maio. 2025.


Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


JNT - Facit Business and Technology Journal

ISSN 2526-4281